Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1

 

x	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010
or
o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Commission File No. 000-19621

 

APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  952-930-9000

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  o Yes    x No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  o Yes  x No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes  o No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such file).  o Yes  o No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes  x No

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of $1.67 per share, as of July 4, 2009 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $7,644,888.

 

As of March 1, 2010, there were outstanding 4,577,777 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, without par value.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 13, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

 

 

Table of Contents

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010 is being filed to conform the certifications to the form set forth in Item 601(b)(31)(i) of Regulation S-K, include Exhibits for amendments 18 through 26 of our General Credit and Security Agreement dated August 30, 1996, as amended, and a list of our subsidiaries as required by Item 401(c)(1) of Regulation S-K.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

		Page
	PART II
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	3
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	27
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	28
SIGNATURES		30
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		31

 

2

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 8.                  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Description		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009		5
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009		6
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009		7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009		8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		9

 

3

Table of Contents

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders, Audit Committee and Board of Directors

Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Minneapolis, Minnesota

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of its internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

 

Minneapolis, MN

March 17, 2010

 

4

Table of Contents

 

APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands)

 

		January 2,			January 3,
		2010			2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	2,799		$	3,498
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $41 and $292, respectively		4,252			6,056
Inventories, net of reserves of $519 and $115, respectively		16,785			18,834
Deferred income taxes		677			448
Other current assets		532			950
Total current assets		25,045			29,786
Property and equipment, net		4,139			6,967
Restricted cash		700			—
Deferred income taxes		—			177
Other assets		1,566			485
Total assets		$	31,450		$	37,415
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	3,364		$	4,473
Checks issued in excess of bank balance		410			—
Accrued expenses		4,401			4,073
Line of credit		12,419			14,527
Current maturities of long-term obligations		544			579
Income taxes payable		188			362
Total current liabilities		21,326			24,014
Long-term obligations, less current maturities		1,963			4,892
Deferred gain, net of current portion		1,827			—
Deferred income tax liabilities		691			520
Total liabilities		25,807			29,426
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Shareholders’ equity:
Common Stock, no par value; 10,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 4,578 shares		17,278			16,221
Accumulated deficit		(11,267		)	(7,929		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(368		)	(303		)
Total shareholders’ equity		5,643			7,989
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	31,450		$	37,415

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5

Table of Contents

 

APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2,			January 3,
		2010			2009
Revenues:
Retail		$	75,022		$	76,179
Recycling		22,799			29,628
Byproduct		3,448			5,164
Total revenues		101,269			110,971
Cost of revenues		72,892			75,361
Gross profit		28,377			35,610
Selling, general and administrative expenses		30,538			31,575
Operating income (loss)		(2,161		)	4,035
Other expense:
Interest expense, net		(1,158		)	(1,377		)
Other expense		(14		)	(55		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes		(3,333		)	2,603
Provision for income taxes		5			739
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(3,338		)	1,864
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(812		)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(692		)
Net income (loss)		$	(3,338	)	$	360
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations		$	(0.73	)	$	0.41
Discontinued operations		—			(0.33		)
Net income (loss)		$	(0.73	)	$	0.08
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations		$	(0.73	)	$	0.41
Discontinued operations		—			(0.33		)
Net income (loss)		$	(0.73	)	$	0.08
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		4,578			4,571
Diluted		4,578			4,612

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

6

Table of Contents

 

APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In Thousands)

 

							Accumulated
							Other
		Common Stock					Comprehensive			Accumulated
		Shares		Amount			Income (loss)			Deficit			Total
Balance at December 29, 2007		4,509		$	15,475		$	76		$	(8,289	)	$	7,262
Net income		—		—			—			360			360
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		—			(379		)	—			(379		)
Exercise of stock options		69		217			—			—			217
Share-based compensation		—		529			—			—			529
Balance at January 3, 2009		4,578		16,221			(303		)	(7,929		)	7,989
Net loss		—		—			—			(3,338		)	(3,338		)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		—			(65		)	—			(65		)
Issuance of warrant		—		479			—			—			479
Share-based compensation		—		578			—			—			578
Balance at January 2, 2010		4,578		$	17,278		$	(368	)	$	(11,267	)	$	5,643

 

Comprehensive loss is as follows:

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2,			January 3,
		2010			2009
Net income (loss)		$	(3,338	)	$	360
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		(65		)	(452		)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments related to discontinued operations recognized in net income		—			73
Comprehensive loss		$	(3,403	)	$	(19	)

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

7

Table of Contents

 

APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2,			January 3,
		2010			2009
Operating activities
Net income (loss)		$	(3,338	)	$	360
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations		—			692
Depreciation and amortization		1,287			1,123
Amortization of deferred gain		(122		)	—
Provision for bad debts		69			264
Share-based compensation		578			529
Deferred income taxes		(58		)	72
Other		88			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,735			3,570
Inventories		2,094			(5,041		)
Other current assets		418			45
Other assets		12			(4		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,268		)	(164		)
Income taxes payable		(159		)	203
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		1,336			1,649
Investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(509		)	(812		)
Increase in restricted cash		(700		)	—
Proceeds from sale of building and equipment		4,635			—
Investment in DALI		(263		)	—
Loan to 4301 Operations		(375		)	—
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		2,788			(812		)
Financing activities
Checks issued in excess of cash in bank		410			(310		)
Net borrowings (payments) under line of credit		(2,108		)	942
Payments on long-term obligations		(3,214		)	(482		)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		—			217
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		(4,912		)	367
Effect of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents		89			(483		)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		(699		)	721
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,498			2,777
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	2,799		$	3,498
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash payments for interest		$	1,161		$	1,385
Cash payments for income taxes, net		$	220		$	397
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Equipment acquired under capital lease		$	259		$	518
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback of building		$	2,436		$	—
Issuance of warrant in connection with recycling contract		$	479		$	—

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

8

Table of Contents

 

APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

 

1.              Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

 

Nature of business:  Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“we,” the “Company” or “ARCA”) are in the business of selling new major household appliances through a chain of Company-owned factory outlet stores under the name ApplianceSmart®.  We also provide turnkey appliance recycling and replacement services for electric utilities and other sponsors of energy efficiency programs.

 

Principles of consolidation:  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and our subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

ARCA Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary.  ARCA Canada was formed in September 2006 to provide turnkey recycling services for electric utility energy efficiency programs.  The operating results of ARCA Canada have been consolidated in our financial statements.

 

We were a sixty percent owner in North America Appliance Company, LLC (“NAACO”).  NAACO was formed and commenced operations in June 2003 and was a retailer of special-buy appliances in Texas.  The operating results of NAACO have been consolidated in our financial statements.

 

We were a sixty percent owner in Productos Duraderos de Norte America (“PDN”), a Mexican corporation.  PDN was acquired in September 2006 and refurbished room air conditioners for sale through our NAACO operation in McAllen, Texas, and through our ApplianceSmart Factory Outlet stores.  The operating results of PDN have been consolidated in our financial statements.

 

Discontinued operations:  During the fourth quarter of 2008, we planned and executed the shutdown of our NAACO and PDN businesses.  NAACO and PDN were not operating as planned and were no longer economically viable.

 

Reclassifications:  Certain prior year items have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.  We reclassified the results of our discontinued operations below income (loss) from continuing operations in the consolidated statements of operations.  In Note 15, we reclassified certain assets, revenue and operating income items between our retail, recycling and unallocated corporate segments.

 

Fair value of financial instruments:  The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable:  Due to their nature and short-term maturities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value.

 

Short- and long-term debt:  The fair value of short- and long-term debt approximates carrying value and has been estimated based on discounted cash flows using interest rates being offered for similar debt having the same or similar remaining maturities and collateral requirements.

 

No separate comparison of fair values versus carrying values is presented for the aforementioned financial instruments since their fair values are not significantly different than their balance sheet carrying amounts.  In addition, the aggregate fair values of the financial instruments would not represent the underlying value of our Company.

 

Estimates:  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported

 

9

Table of Contents

 

amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include the valuation allowances for accounts receivable, inventories and deferred tax assets, accrued expenses, and the assumptions we use to value share-based compensation.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fiscal year:  We report on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year.  Our 2009 fiscal year (“2009”) ended on January 2, 2010 and included 52 weeks.  Our 2008 fiscal year (“2008”) ended on January 3, 2009 and included 53 weeks.

 

2.              Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

 

On October 3, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance related to accounting standards codification and the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).  The new guidance will become the source of authoritative non-SEC authoritative GAAP.  The guidance establishes a two-level GAAP hierarchy for nongovernmental entities: authoritative guidance and nonauthoritative guidance.  Authoritative guidance consists of the Codification and, for SEC registrants, rules and interpretative releases of the Commission.  Nonauthoritative guidance consists of non-SEC accounting literature that is not included in the Codification and has not been grandfathered.  The new guidance, including the Codification, is effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

 

On January 3, 2010, we plan to adopt new accounting guidance related to consolidation of variable interest entities.  The new guidance addresses the effects of eliminating the qualified special purpose entity concept and responds to concerns about the application of accounting guidance related to the consolidation of variable interest entities, including concerns over the transparency of enterprises’ involvement with variable interest entities. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.  We do not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets

 

On January 3, 2010, we plan to adopt new accounting guidance related to accounting for transfers of financial assets.  The new guidance eliminates the concept of a “qualified special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an entity’s continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.  We do not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Subsequent Events

 

On July 4, 2009, we adopted new guidance related to subsequent events.  The new guidance requires all public entities to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are available to be issued and disclose in the notes the date through which the Company has evaluated subsequent events and whether the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued on the disclosed date.  The new guidance defines two types of subsequent events, as follows: the first type consists of events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, and the second type consists of events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date.  The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively.  In February 2010, the new guidance related to subsequent events was amended for SEC filers to delete the requirement to disclose the date through which the Company has to evaluate subsequent events.  The adoption of the new guidance and related amendment thereto did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

 

10

Table of Contents

 

Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

 

On January 4, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance related to disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities.  The new guidance is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.  The new guidance also improves transparency about the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entity’s financial statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect its financial position, financial performance and cash flows.  The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.  The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

 

Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements

 

On January 4, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance related to noncontrolling interests on consolidated financial statements.  The new guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries and clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements.  The new guidance also requires expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

 

Business Combinations

 

On January 4, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance related to business combinations.  The new accounting guidance establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination: recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or the gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information should be disclosed in the financial statements to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

 

3.     Significant Accounting Policies

 

Cash and cash equivalents:  We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturity dates of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  We maintain our cash in bank deposit and money-market accounts which, at times, exceed federally insured limits.  We have determined that the fair value of the money-market accounts fall within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.  We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.

 

Trade receivables:  We carry unsecured trade receivables at the original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based on a monthly review of all outstanding amounts.  Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic conditions.  We write off trade receivables when we deem them uncollectible.  We record recoveries of trade receivables previously written off when we receive them.  We consider a trade receivable to be past due if any portion of the receivable balance is outstanding for more than ninety days.  We do not charge interest on past due receivables.  In 2009, we wrote off $320 of uncollectible receivables primarily reserved for in 2008.  Our management considers the allowance for doubtful accounts of $41 and $292 to be adequate to cover any exposure to loss as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.

 

11

Table of Contents

 

Inventories:  Inventories, consisting principally of appliances, are stated at the lower of cost, determined on a specific identification basis, or market and consist of:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Finished goods		$	17,304		$	18,949
Less provision for inventory obsolescence		(519		)	(115		)
		$	16,785		$	18,834

 

We provide estimated provisions for the obsolescence of our appliance inventories, including adjustments to market, based on various factors, including the age of such inventory and our management’s assessment of the need for such provisions.  We look at historical inventory agings and margin analysis in determining our provision estimate.

 

Property and equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost. We compute depreciation using straight-line and accelerated methods over the following estimated useful lives:

 

		Years
Buildings and improvements		18-30
Equipment (including computer software)		3-8

 

We amortize leasehold improvements on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the underlying lease term.  Repair and maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred.

 

Property and equipment consists of the following:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Land		$	1,140		$	2,050
Buildings and improvements		2,990			5,249
Equipment (including computer software)		9,082			9,161
		13,212			16,460
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(9,073		)	(9,493		)
		$	4,139		$	6,967

 

In 2009, we wrote off $597 of fully depreciated assets that were no longer in use, which did not have an impact on our operating results.  In 2009, we also reduced land, building and improvements and accumulated depreciation by $910, $2,317 and $1,036, respectively, as a result of the sale-leaseback transaction described in Note 4.

 

Depreciation and amortization expense:  Depreciation and amortization expense related to buildings and equipment from our recycling centers is presented in cost of revenues and depreciation and amortization expense related to buildings and equipment from our ApplianceSmart Factory Outlet stores and corporate assets, such as furniture and computers, is presented in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.  Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,287 and $1,123 for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.

 

Software development costs:  We capitalize software developed for internal use and are amortizing such costs over their estimated useful lives of three to five years.  Costs capitalized were $207 and $262 for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.  Amortization expense on software development costs was $314 and $256 for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.  Estimated amortization expenses are $249, $141, $30 and $2 for the fiscal years 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

 

Impairment of long-lived assets:  We evaluate long-lived assets such as property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.  We assess impairment

 

12

Table of Contents

 

based on the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cash flows from disposition.  Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value, we recognize an impairment loss at that time.  We measure an impairment loss by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value (estimated discounted future cash flows or appraisal of assets) of the long-lived assets.  We recognized no impairment charges during the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009.

 

Restricted cash:   Restricted cash consists of a reserve account required by our bankcard processor to cover chargebacks, adjustments, fees and other charges that may be due from us.

 

Accounting for leases:  We conduct the majority of our retail and recycling operations from leased facilities.  The majority of our leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance in addition to rent.  The terms of our lease agreements typically range from five to ten years.  Most of the leases contain renewal and escalation clauses, and certain store leases require contingent rents based on factors such as revenue.  For leases that contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rent, we recognize the related rent expense on a straight-line basis from the date we take possession of the property to the end of the initial lease term.  We record any difference between straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases as part of deferred rent in accrued expenses.  Cash or lease incentives (tenant allowances) received upon entering into certain store leases are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rent from the date we take possession of the property through the end of the initial lease term.

 

Product warranty:  We provide a warranty for the replacement or repair of certain defective units.  Our standard warranty policy requires us to repair or replace certain defective units at no cost to our customers.  We estimate the costs that may be incurred under our warranty and record an accrual in the amount of such costs at the time we recognize product revenue.  Factors that affect our warranty accrual for covered units include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims on these units, and the cost of such claims.  We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty accrual and adjust the amounts as necessary.

 

Changes in our warranty accrual for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 are as follows:

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Beginning Balance		$	91		$	80
Standard accrual based on units sold		79			87
Actual costs incurred		(16		)	(4		)
Periodic accrual adjustments		(87		)	(72		)
Ending Balance		$	67		$	91

 

Income taxes:  We account for income taxes under the liability method.  Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will result in taxable amounts in future years.  Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and tax operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled.  We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amounts we believe to be realizable.  We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets was appropriate as of January 2, 2010.

 

Share-based compensation:  We recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for all share-based awards granted.  We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of awards at the grant date.  We calculate the expected volatility for stock options and awards using historical volatility.  We estimate a 0%-5% forfeiture rate for stock options issued to all employees and Board of Directors members, but will continue to review these estimates in future periods.  The risk-free rates for the expected terms of the stock options are based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.  The expected life represents the period that the stock option awards are expected to be outstanding.  The expected dividend yield is zero as we have not paid or declared any cash dividends on

 

13

Table of Contents

 

our Common Stock.  Based on these valuations, we recognized share-based compensation expense of $578 and $529 for the fiscal years ending January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.  We estimate that the expense for fiscal 2010 will be approximately $177 and immaterial thereafter, based on the value of options outstanding as of January 2, 2010.  This estimate does not include any expense for additional options that may be granted and vest during 2010.

 

Comprehensive income (loss):  Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income (loss) but are excluded from net income (loss) as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to shareholders’ equity.  Our other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments.  The effect of the foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, was a loss of $65 and $452 for the fiscal years ending January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.

 

Revenue recognition:  We recognize revenue from appliance sales in the period the consumer purchases and pays for the appliance, net of an allowance for estimated returns.  We recognize revenue from appliance recycling when we collect and process a unit.  We recognize byproduct revenue upon shipment.  We recognize revenue on extended warranties with retained service obligations on a straight-line basis over the period of the warranty.  On extended warranty arrangements that we sell but others service for a fixed portion of the warranty sales price, we recognize revenue for the net amount retained at the time of sale of the extended warranty to the consumer.  We include shipping and handling charges to customers in revenue, which are recognized in the period the consumer purchases and pays for delivery.  Shipping and handling costs that we incur are included in cost of revenues.

 

Taxes collected from customers:  We account for taxes collected from customers on a net basis.

 

Advertising expense:  Our policy is to expense advertising costs as incurred.  Advertising expense was $3,746 and $4,258 for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.

 

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share:  Basic income (loss) per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted by the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding had the potentially dilutive common shares been issued.  Potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock include unexercised stock options and warrants.  Basic per share amounts are computed, generally, by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted per share amounts assume the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential Common Stock instruments unless their effect is anti-dilutive, thereby reducing the loss or increasing the income per common share.  In calculating diluted weighted average shares and per share amounts, we included stock options with exercise prices below average market prices, for the respective fiscal years in which they were dilutive, using the treasury stock method.  We calculated the number of additional shares by assuming the outstanding stock options were exercised and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire Common Stock at the average market price during the year.  We excluded 303 options in fiscal 2008 from the diluted weighted average share outstanding calculation as the effect of these options is anti-dilutive.  The effect of all options and warrants outstanding in fiscal year 2009 was anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred.

 

14

Table of Contents

 

A reconciliation of the denominator in the basic and diluted income or loss per share is as follows:

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2,			January 3,
		2010			2009
Numerator:
Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(3,338	)	$	1,864
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(812		)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(692		)
Net income (loss)		$	(3,338	)	$	360
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		4,578			4,571
Stock options		—			41
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		4,578			4,612
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations		$	(0.73	)	$	0.41
Discontinued operations		—			(0.33		)
Net income (loss)		$	(0.73	)	$	0.08
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations		$	(0.73	)	$	0.41
Discontinued operations		—			(0.33		)
Net income (loss)		$	(0.73	)	$	0.08

 

4.              Sale-Leaseback Transaction

 

On September 25, 2009, we completed the sale-leaseback of our St. Louis Park building.  The building is a 126,458-square-foot facility that includes our corporate office, a processing and recycling center, and an ApplianceSmart Factory Outlet store.  Pursuant to the agreement entered into on August 11, 2009, we sold the St. Louis Park building for $4,627, net of fees, and leased the building back over an initial lease term of five years.  The sale of the building provided the Company with $2,032 in cash after repayment of the $2,595 mortgage.  The sale-leaseback transaction resulted in an adjustment of $2,191 to the net book value related to the land and building, and we recorded a deferred gain of $2,436.  Under the terms of the lease agreement, we are classifying the lease as an operating lease and amortizing the gain on a straight-line basis over five years.

 

5.              Discontinued Operations

 

During the fourth quarter of 2008, we planned and executed the shutdown of our NAACO and PDN operations.  NAACO and PDN were not operating as planned and were no longer economically viable.  In 2008, our supply of room air conditioners from a major manufacturer was depleted, no longer providing refurbishment opportunities for PDN and revenues for NAACO, which was the basis for our investment in these businesses.  We have not had any continuing involvement or significant continuing cash flows in these businesses.  The results of operations for NAACO and PDN were included in our retail segment.  During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009, NAACO and PDN had revenues of $792 and a loss before taxes of $882.  All results of operations for periods presented prior to the abandonment date have been reclassified as discontinued operations.  We recorded a loss on the disposal of NAACO and PDN of $692, net of tax, for the year ended January 3, 2009, which consisted of termination costs and the write-off of certain assets to fair value upon the abandonment of the operations in December 2008.

 

15

Table of Contents

 

6.              Investments

 

On June 1, 2009, we completed a $263 investment in Diagnostico y Administracion de Logistica Inversa, S.A. de C.V. (“DALI”), a Mexican company.  DALI is a joint venture that operates a refrigerator recycling program sponsored by the Mexican government.  Our investment represents a 46.3% ownership in the joint venture.  The DALI joint venture is accounted for under the equity method and is presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of other assets.  The results of the joint venture were immaterial for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010.

 

On October 21, 2009, we entered into an Appliance Sales and Recycling Agreement (the “Agreement”).  Under the Agreement, our client will sell all of its recyclable appliances generated in the northeastern United States to us, and we will collect, process and recycle such recyclable appliances.  The Agreement requires that we will only recycle, and will not sell for re-use or resale, the recyclable appliances purchased from our client.  We plan to establish a regional processing center (“RPC”) located in the northeastern United States at which the recyclable appliances will be processed.  The term of the Agreement is for a period of six years from the first date of collection of recyclable appliances, which we expect will be early in the second quarter of 2010. We issued a warrant in conjunction with the Agreement as described in Note 13.  The fair market value of the warrant was recorded as an intangible asset and will be amortized over the initial term of the Agreement.  The recycling contract intangible asset is presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of other assets.

 

In connection with the Agreement described above, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with 4301 Operations, LLC, to establish and operate the northeastern RPC.  4301 Operations has substantial experience in the recycling of major household appliances and will contribute their existing business to the joint venture.  Under the Joint Venture Agreement, the parties will form a new entity to be known as ARCA Advanced Processing, LLC (“AAP”) and each party will be a 50% owner of AAP.  If additional RPCs are established, AAP will establish the next two RPCs and will have a right of first refusal to establish subsequent RPCs.  We plan to raise debt and/or equity financing to fund our share of the capital required to form the joint venture.  We plan to contribute approximately $2,000, including the Appliance Sales and Recycling Agreement, to the joint venture, and 4301 Operations plans to contribute their equipment and existing business to the joint venture.  The joint venture plans to commence operations early in the second quarter of 2010; however, there is no assurance that operations will commence or that financing will be available on terms satisfactory to us or permitted by our current debt agreement.  As of January 2, 2010, we loaned 4301 Operations $375 that will be considered as a portion of our capital contribution when the joint venture commences operations.  The loan to 4301 Operations is presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of other assets.

 

The Agreement is contingent on the ability of the joint venture to raise additional financing to purchase and install UNTHA Recycling Technology (“URT”) equipment, which will enhance the capabilities of the RPC.  We are the exclusive distributor of URT equipment for North America.  The joint venture plans to raise additional debt financing to purchase the URT equipment, but there is no assurance that the financing will be available or on terms acceptable to the joint venture.

 

7.              Other Assets

 

Other assets as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 consist of the following:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Deposits		$	407		$	408
Investment in DALI		263			—
Loan to 4301 Operations, LLC		375			—
Recycling contract, net		479			—
Other		42			77
		$	1,566		$	485

 

16

Table of Contents

 

8.              Accrued Expenses

 

Accrued expenses as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 consist of the following:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Compensation and benefits		$	868		$	1,565
Accrued recycling incentive checks		1,232			1,110
Accrued rent		1,176			461
Warranty expense		67			91
Accrued payables		350			509
Current portion of deferred gain on sale-leaseback of building		488			—
Other		220			337
		$	4,401		$	4,073

 

9.              Line of Credit

 

We have an $18,000 line of credit with a lender.  The line was increased from $16,000 to $18,000 on February 5, 2008.  The interest rate on the line was 6.25% (the greater of prime plus 3.00 percentage points or 6.25%) as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009.  The weighted average interest rate for fiscal years 2010 and 2009 was 6.25% and 6.83%, respectively.  The amount of borrowings available under the line of credit is based on a formula using receivables and inventories.  Our unused borrowing capacity under this line was $56 as of January 2, 2010.  We may not have access to the full $18.0 million line of credit due to the formula using our receivables and inventories.  The line of credit has a stated maturity date of December 31, 2010, if not renewed, and provides that the lender may demand payment in full of the entire outstanding balance of the loan at any time.  The line of credit is collateralized by substantially all our assets and requires minimum monthly interest payments of $58, regardless of the outstanding principal balance.  The lender is also secured by an inventory repurchase agreement with Whirlpool Corporation for purchases from Whirlpool only.  The loan requires that we meet certain financial covenants, provides payment penalties for noncompliance and prepayment, limits the amount of other debt we can incur, limits the amount of spending on fixed assets and prohibits payments of dividends.  As of January 2, 2010, we were not in compliance with certain financial covenants of the loan agreement and received a waiver from the lender.  On March 10, 2010, the interest rate on the line increased to 6.75% (the greater of prime plus 3.50 percentage points or 6.75%).

 

10.       Long-Term Debt Obligations

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 consist of the following:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
6.85 % mortgage, due in monthly installments of $15, including interest, due January 2013, collateralized by land and building		$	1,586		$	1,659
Adjustable rate mortgage, due in monthly installments, adjusted weekly based on 30-day LIBOR plus 2.70 percentage points (3.38% as of January 3, 2009) on a 20-year amortization due October 2012, collateralized by land and building		—			2,747
Capital leases and other financing obligations		921			1,065
		2,507			5,471
Less current maturities		544			579
		$	1,963		$	4,892

 

In September 2009, we paid off our adjustable rate mortgage as a result of the sale-leaseback transaction described in Note 4.

 

17

Table of Contents

 

The future annual maturities of long-term debt obligations are as follows:

 

2010		$	544
2011		412
2012		197
2013		1,350
2014		4
		$	2,507

 

Capital leases and other financing obligations:  We acquire certain equipment under capital leases and other financing obligations.  The cost of equipment was approximately $1,615 and $1,396 at January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively.  Accumulated amortization at January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 was approximately $802 and $387, respectively.  Depreciation and amortization expense for equipment under capital leases and other financing obligations is included in cost of revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

In 2008, we entered into a master equipment lease with a lender providing up to $250 in available funds.  As of January 3, 2009, we had utilized the entire lease line to fund equipment for factory outlet stores.  In 2009, we entered into a master equipment lease with a lender providing up to $188 in available funds.  As of January 2, 2010, we had utilized the entire lease line to fund equipment and displays for factory outlet stores.

 

The following schedule by fiscal year is the approximate remaining minimum payments required under the leases and other financing obligations, together with the present value at January 2, 2010:

 

2010		$	537
2011		358
2012		114
2013		13
2014		4
Total minimum lease and other financing obligation payments		1,026
Less amount representing interest		105
Present value of minimum payments		921
Less current portion		466
Capital lease and other financing obligations, net of current portion		$	455

 

11.       Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating leases:  We lease the majority of our retail stores and recycling centers under noncancelable operating leases.  The leases typically require the payment of taxes, maintenance, utilities and insurance.

 

Minimum future rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases as of January 2, 2010 are as follows:

 

2010		$	4,534
2011		4,541
2012		4,349
2013		3,966
2014		3,130
2015 and thereafter		5,734
		$	26,254

 

Rent expense for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 was $4,960 and $4,710, respectively.

 

18

Table of Contents

 

Contracts:  We have entered into material contracts with three appliance manufacturers.  Under the agreements there are no minimum purchase commitments; however, we have agreed to indemnify the manufacturers for certain claims, allegations or losses with respect to appliances we sell.

 

Litigation:  In December 2004, we filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging that JACO Environmental, Inc. (JACO) and one of our former consultants fraudulently obtained U.S. Patent No. 6,732,416 in May 2004 covering appliance recycling methods and systems which were originally developed by us beginning in 1987 and used in serving more than forty-five electric utility appliance recycling programs up to the time the suit was filed.  We sought an injunction to prevent JACO from claiming that it obtained a valid patent on appliance recycling processes that we believe is based on methods and processes we invented.  In addition, we asked the Court to find that the patent obtained by JACO is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct before the United States Patent Office.  We also asked the court for unspecified damages related to charges that JACO, in using the patent to promote its services, engaged in unfair competition and false and misleading advertising under federal and California statutes.

 

In September 2005, we received a legally binding document in which JACO stated it would not sue us or any of our customers for violating the JACO patent.  Further, the defendants in the case did not assert any counterclaims against ARCA.

 

In January 2009, the Court granted JACO a summary judgment in ARCA’s lawsuit against the parties.  The ruling was made by the same judge who had earlier denied summary judgment to the defendants.  Even though the Court’s ruling will have no impact on our method of recycling or ability to conduct existing or future business, we filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California in February 2009 seeking to have the court set aside the summary judgment.  We believe the decision by the trial judge was in error and contrary to the law relating to unfair competition and false advertising.  We believe we are entitled to our day in court against JACO for damages caused by their actions, and our case is scheduled to be argued before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on April 9, 2010.

 

On October 24, 2006, JACO and SEG Umwelt-Service/Basis of Mettlach, Germany (SEG) filed a patent infringement lawsuit in Federal Court in San Francisco against us.  The suit claimed that we had been using refrigerator recycling systems and processes covered by two U.S. patents issued to SEG and exclusively licensed to JACO.  JACO and SEG sought an undisclosed amount in damages, in addition to an injunction barring us from continuing to use and market the systems and processes upon which we allegedly infringed.  This suit was subsequently dismissed following a transfer of the case to Los Angeles upon the motion of ARCA.

 

In December 2009, a lawsuit in the Fourth Judicial District Court of Hennepin County, Minnesota has been commenced by RKL Landholdings, LLC and Emad Y. Abed relating to the potential sale of our St. Louis Park, Minnesota property.  This property has been sold to a third party and all proceeds from the sale have been received by us. The claims made by the Plaintiffs in this matter have been alleged against both Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Edward Cameron, individually.  The claims relate to an originally executed Purchase Agreement and extensions thereto executed between the parties, which Purchase Agreement and extensions all expired by their own terms.  The Plaintiffs have alleged various facts and claims, including promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, conversion, fraud, tortuous interference with prospective advantage, and breach of contract.  We plan to vigorously defend these claims and believe that any outcome will not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.

 

We are party from time to time to other ordinary course disputes that we do not believe to be material.

 

19

Table of Contents

 

12.  Income Taxes

 

The provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 consisted of the following:

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Current tax expense:
Federal		$	—		$	128
State		39			44
Foreign		24			495
Current tax expense		$	63		$	667
Deferred tax expense		(58		)	72
Provision for income taxes		$	5		$	739

 

A reconciliation of our provision for income taxes with the federal statutory tax rate for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 is shown below:

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Income tax expense (benefit) at statutory rate		$	(1,133	)	$	885
State tax expense (benefit), net of federal tax effect		(110		)	71
Permanent differences		242			275
Changes in valuation allowance		192			(657		)
Reversal of deferred tax asset for change in tax law		962			—
Foreign income tax payable true-up		(206		)	—
Foreign rate differential		(3		)	54
Other		61			111
		$	5		$	739

 

We recorded a discrete item in the second quarter of 2009 related to additional Canadian tax deductions determined by completing a detailed transfer pricing study.  We recognized a tax benefit of approximately $206 related solely to our Canadian operations compared to the original tax provision estimate for fiscal 2008.

 

20

Table of Contents

 

The components of net deferred tax assets as of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 are as follows:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards		$	868		$	1,734
Federal and state tax credits		323			312
Reserves		367			322
Accrued expenses		229			278
Share-based compensation		107			82
Deferred gain		913			—
Foreign currency translation		—			177
		2,807			2,905
Valuation allowance		(2,379		)	(2,187		)
Deferred tax assets		428			718
Deferred tax liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(112		)	(152		)
Property and equipment		(330		)	(452		)
Other		—			(9		)
Deferred tax liabilities		(442		)	(613		)
Net deferred tax assets		$	(14	)	$	105

 

The deferred tax amounts mentioned above have been classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:

 

		January 2, 2010			January 3, 2009
Current assets		$	677		$	448
Non-current assets		—			177
Non-current liabilities		(691		)	(520		)
		$	(14	)	$	105

 

At January 2, 2010, we had a full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets to reduce the total to an amount our management believes is appropriate.  Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the periods when deductible temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income.  The valuation allowance increased in the current year primarily as a result of taxable losses generated during the year from U.S. sources and was partially offset by the reversal of deferred tax assets as a result of a change in state tax law.  In the future, when we believe we can reasonably estimate future operating results and those estimated results reflect taxable income, the amount of deferred tax assets considered reasonable could be adjusted by a reduction of the valuation allowance.

 

We have not recognized a deferred tax liability relating to cumulative undistributed earnings of controlled foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration.  If some or all of the undistributed earnings of the controlled foreign subsidiaries are remitted to us in the future, income taxes, if any, after the application of foreign tax credits will be provided at that time.

 

Future utilization of net operating loss (“NOL”) and tax credit carryforwards is subject to certain limitations under provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.  This section relates to a 50 percent change in control over a three-year period.  We believe that the issuance of Common Stock during 1999 resulted in an “ownership change” under Section 382.  Accordingly, our ability to use NOL and tax credit carryforwards generated prior to February 1999 is limited to approximately $56 per year.

 

At January 2, 2010, we had federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $8,707 ($6,639 of which is subject to IRC section 382 limitations) and credits for general business credits of $13.  In addition to general business credits we also had alternative

 

21

Table of Contents

 

minimum tax credits carried forward of approximately $310.  We also had state NOL carryforwards of $8,862 ($2,642 of which is subject to IRC section 382 limitations).  The NOL carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income or reduce taxes payable through 2027.  These loss carryforwards will begin expiring in 2016.  The general business credits will expire in 2013.  We previously wrote off NOLs related to IRC section 382 limits against the valuation allowance.

 

A portion of our net operating loss carryforwards (approximately $930 of tax deductions) resulted from the exercise of stock options.  When these loss carryforwards are realized, the corresponding change in valuation allowance will be recorded as additional paid-in capital.  We have adopted the “with and without” approach to determine tax benefits.  Under this approach, windfall tax benefits are used last to offset taxable income and a benefit is recorded in additional paid-in capital only if an incremental benefit is provided after considering all other tax attributes (including NOLs) presently available to us.  This treatment results in a re-characterization of the NOL carryforward and a difference in the NOL asset between the financial statements and tax returns.  The difference in the federal NOL deferred tax asset is $316.

 

At January 2, 2010, we had NOL carryforwards not subject to IRC section 382 limitations, expiring as follows:

 

2026		1,357
2029		711

 

We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position.  For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.  As of January 2, 2010, we did not have any material uncertain tax positions.

 

It is our practice to recognize interest related to income tax matters as a component of interest expense and penalties as a component of selling, general and administrative expense.  As of January 2, 2010, we had an immaterial amount of accrued interest and penalties.

 

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, foreign jurisdictions and various state jurisdictions.  Tax regulations from each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply.  With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, foreign, state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2006.  We are not currently under examination by any taxing jurisdiction.

 

We had no significant unrecognized tax benefits as of January 2, 2010 that would reasonably be expected to affect our effective tax rate during the next twelve months.

 

13.  Shareholders’ Equity

 

Stock options:  Our 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”) permits the granting of incentive stock options meeting the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and nonqualified options that do not meet the requirements of Section 422.  The 2006 Plan has 600 shares available for grant.  As of January 2, 2010, 380 options were outstanding to employees and non-employee directors and 15 options have been exercised under the 2006 Plan.  Our Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Plan”) has expired, but the options outstanding under the expired 1997 Plan continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms.  As of January 2, 2010, options to purchase an aggregate of 33 shares were outstanding under the 1997 Plan.  Options granted to employees typically vest over two years while grants to non-employee directors vest in six months.

 

22

Table of Contents

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009:

 

		For the fiscal year ended
		January 2, 2010		January 3, 2009
Expected dividend yield		—		—
Expected stock price volatility		105.39	%	104.72	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.77	%	3.39	%
Expected life of options (years)		7.00		6.88

 

Additional information relating to all outstanding options is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 

				Weighted
				Average
		Options		Exercise
		Outstanding		Price
Balance at December 29, 2007		144		$	3.34
Granted		282		5.02
Exercised		(69	)	3.21
Cancelled/expired		(2	)	2.53
Forfeited		(16	)	5.86
Balance at January 3, 2009		339		4.65
Granted		102		2.04
Cancelled/expired		(9	)	4.68
Forfeited		(19	)	2.55
Balance at January 2, 2010		413		4.10

 

The weighted average fair value per option of options granted during fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was $1.74 and $4.26, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of January 2, 2010 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

				Weighted Average
				Remaining
		Options		Contractual Life		Weighted Average			Aggregate
Range of Exercise Prices		Outstanding		In Years		Exercise Price			Intrinsic Value
$5.05 to $6.41		219		5.46		$	5.48
$3.81 to $4.32		30		4.58		4.06
$2.38 to $2.80		127		5.61		2.39
$1.50 to $2.00		37		8.77		1.87
		413		5.74		4.10			$	20

 

23